找了好久的pthread_mutex_lock函数的实现原理,,现粘贴如下。。。
int
__pthread_mutex_lock (mutex)
pthread_mutex_t *mutex;
{
assert (sizeof (mutex->__size) >= sizeof (mutex->__data));
int oldval;
pid_t id = THREAD_GETMEM (THREAD_SELF, tid);
int retval = 0;
switch (__builtin_expect (mutex->__data.__kind, PTHREAD_MUTEX_TIMED_NP))
{
/* Recursive mutex. */
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP:
/* Check whether we already hold the mutex. */
if (mutex->__data.__owner == id)
{
/* Just bump the counter. */
if (__builtin_expect (mutex->__data.__count + 1 == 0, 0))
/* Overflow of the counter. */
return EAGAIN;
++mutex->__data.__count;
return 0;
}
/* We have to get the mutex. */
LLL_MUTEX_LOCK (mutex->__data.__lock);
assert (mutex->__data.__owner == 0);
mutex->__data.__count = 1;
break;
/* Error checking mutex. */
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK_NP:
/* Check whether we already hold the mutex. */
if (__builtin_expect (mutex->__data.__owner == id, 0))
return EDEADLK;
/* FALLTHROUGH */
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_TIMED_NP:
simple:
/* Normal mutex. */
LLL_MUTEX_LOCK (mutex->__data.__lock);
assert (mutex->__data.__owner == 0);
break;
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_ADAPTIVE_NP:
if (! __is_smp)
goto simple;
if (LLL_MUTEX_TRYLOCK (mutex->__data.__lock) != 0)
{
int cnt = 0;
int max_cnt = MIN (MAX_ADAPTIVE_COUNT,
mutex->__data.__spins * 2 + 10);
do
{
if (cnt++ >= max_cnt)
{
LLL_MUTEX_LOCK (mutex->__data.__lock);
break;
}
#ifdef BUSY_WAIT_NOP
BUSY_WAIT_NOP;
#endif
}
while (LLL_MUTEX_TRYLOCK (mutex->__data.__lock) != 0);
mutex->__data.__spins += (cnt – mutex->__data.__spins) / 8;
}
assert (mutex->__data.__owner == 0);
break;
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_RECURSIVE_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_ERRORCHECK_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_NORMAL_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_ADAPTIVE_NP:
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending,
&mutex->__data.__list.__next);
oldval = mutex->__data.__lock;
do
{
again:
if ((oldval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) != 0)
{
/* The previous owner died. Try locking the mutex. */
int newval = id;
#ifdef NO_INCR
newval |= FUTEX_WAITERS;
#else
newval |= (oldval & FUTEX_WAITERS);
#endif
newval
= atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
newval, oldval);
if (newval != oldval)
{
oldval = newval;
goto again;
}
/* We got the mutex. */
mutex->__data.__count = 1;
/* But it is inconsistent unless marked otherwise. */
mutex->__data.__owner = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INCONSISTENT;
ENQUEUE_MUTEX (mutex);
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL);
/* Note that we deliberately exit here. If we fall
through to the end of the function __nusers would be
incremented which is not correct because the old
owner has to be discounted. If we are not supposed
to increment __nusers we actually have to decrement
it here. */
#ifdef NO_INCR
–mutex->__data.__nusers;
#endif
return EOWNERDEAD;
}
/* Check whether we already hold the mutex. */
if (__builtin_expect ((oldval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) == id, 0))
{
if (mutex->__data.__kind
== PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_ERRORCHECK_NP)
{
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending,
NULL);
return EDEADLK;
}
if (mutex->__data.__kind
== PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_RECURSIVE_NP)
{
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending,
NULL);
/* Just bump the counter. */
if (__builtin_expect (mutex->__data.__count + 1 == 0, 0))
/* Overflow of the counter. */
return EAGAIN;
++mutex->__data.__count;
return 0;
}
}
oldval = LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK (mutex->__data.__lock, id);
if (__builtin_expect (mutex->__data.__owner
== PTHREAD_MUTEX_NOTRECOVERABLE, 0))
{
/* This mutex is now not recoverable. */
mutex->__data.__count = 0;
lll_mutex_unlock (mutex->__data.__lock);
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL);
return ENOTRECOVERABLE;
}
}
while ((oldval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) != 0);
mutex->__data.__count = 1;
ENQUEUE_MUTEX (mutex);
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL);
break;
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PI_RECURSIVE_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PI_ERRORCHECK_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PI_NORMAL_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PI_ADAPTIVE_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PI_ROBUST_RECURSIVE_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PI_ROBUST_ERRORCHECK_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PI_ROBUST_NORMAL_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PI_ROBUST_ADAPTIVE_NP:
{
int kind = mutex->__data.__kind & PTHREAD_MUTEX_KIND_MASK_NP;
int robust = mutex->__data.__kind & PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_NORMAL_NP;
if (robust)
/* Note: robust PI futexes are signaled by setting bit 0. */
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending,
(void *) (((uintptr_t) &mutex->__data.__list.__next)
| 1));
oldval = mutex->__data.__lock;
/* Check whether we already hold the mutex. */
if (__builtin_expect ((oldval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) == id, 0))
{
if (kind == PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK_NP)
{
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL);
return EDEADLK;
}
if (kind == PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP)
{
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL);
/* Just bump the counter. */
if (__builtin_expect (mutex->__data.__count + 1 == 0, 0))
/* Overflow of the counter. */
return EAGAIN;
++mutex->__data.__count;
return 0;
}
}
int newval = id;
#ifdef NO_INCR
newval |= FUTEX_WAITERS;
#endif
oldval = atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
newval, 0);
if (oldval != 0)
{
/* The mutex is locked. The kernel will now take care of
everything. */
INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL (__err);
int e = INTERNAL_SYSCALL (futex, __err, 4, &mutex->__data.__lock,
FUTEX_LOCK_PI, 1, 0);
if (INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (e, __err)
&& (INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (e, __err) == ESRCH
|| INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (e, __err) == EDEADLK))
{
assert (INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (e, __err) != EDEADLK
|| (kind != PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK_NP
&& kind != PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP));
/* ESRCH can happen only for non-robust PI mutexes where
the owner of the lock died. */
assert (INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (e, __err) != ESRCH || !robust);
/* Delay the thread indefinitely. */
while (1)
pause_not_cancel ();
}
oldval = mutex->__data.__lock;
assert (robust || (oldval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) == 0);
}
if (__builtin_expect (oldval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED, 0))
{
atomic_and (&mutex->__data.__lock, ~FUTEX_OWNER_DIED);
/* We got the mutex. */
mutex->__data.__count = 1;
/* But it is inconsistent unless marked otherwise. */
mutex->__data.__owner = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INCONSISTENT;
ENQUEUE_MUTEX_PI (mutex);
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL);
/* Note that we deliberately exit here. If we fall
through to the end of the function __nusers would be
incremented which is not correct because the old owner
has to be discounted. If we are not supposed to
increment __nusers we actually have to decrement it here. */
#ifdef NO_INCR
–mutex->__data.__nusers;
#endif
return EOWNERDEAD;
}
if (robust
&& __builtin_expect (mutex->__data.__owner
== PTHREAD_MUTEX_NOTRECOVERABLE, 0))
{
/* This mutex is now not recoverable. */
mutex->__data.__count = 0;
INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL (__err);
INTERNAL_SYSCALL (futex, __err, 4, &mutex->__data.__lock,
FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI, 0, 0);
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL);
return ENOTRECOVERABLE;
}
mutex->__data.__count = 1;
if (robust)
{
ENQUEUE_MUTEX_PI (mutex);
THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL);
}
}
break;
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PP_RECURSIVE_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PP_ERRORCHECK_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PP_NORMAL_NP:
case PTHREAD_MUTEX_PP_ADAPTIVE_NP:
{
int kind = mutex->__data.__kind & PTHREAD_MUTEX_KIND_MASK_NP;
oldval = mutex->__data.__lock;
/* Check whether we already hold the mutex. */
if (mutex->__data.__owner == id)
{
if (kind == PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK_NP)
return EDEADLK;
if (kind == PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP)
{
/* Just bump the counter. */
if (__builtin_expect (mutex->__data.__count + 1 == 0, 0))
/* Overflow of the counter. */
return EAGAIN;
++mutex->__data.__count;
return 0;
}
}
int oldprio = -1, ceilval;
do
{
int ceiling = (oldval & PTHREAD_MUTEX_PRIO_CEILING_MASK)
>> PTHREAD_MUTEX_PRIO_CEILING_SHIFT;
if (__pthread_current_priority () > ceiling)
{
if (oldprio != -1)
__pthread_tpp_change_priority (oldprio, -1);
return EINVAL;
}
retval = __pthread_tpp_change_priority (oldprio, ceiling);
if (retval)
return retval;
ceilval = ceiling << PTHREAD_MUTEX_PRIO_CEILING_SHIFT;
oldprio = ceiling;
oldval
= atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
#ifdef NO_INCR
ceilval | 2,
#else
ceilval | 1,
#endif
ceilval);
if (oldval == ceilval)
break;
do
{
oldval
= atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
ceilval | 2,
ceilval | 1);
if ((oldval & PTHREAD_MUTEX_PRIO_CEILING_MASK) != ceilval)
break;
if (oldval != ceilval)
lll_futex_wait (&mutex->__data.__lock, ceilval | 2);
}
while (atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
ceilval | 2, ceilval)
!= ceilval);
}
while ((oldval & PTHREAD_MUTEX_PRIO_CEILING_MASK) != ceilval);
assert (mutex->__data.__owner == 0);
mutex->__data.__count = 1;
}
break;
default:
/* Correct code cannot set any other type. */
return EINVAL;
}
/* Record the ownership. */
mutex->__data.__owner = id;
#ifndef NO_INCR
++mutex->__data.__nusers;
#endif
return retval;
}
#ifndef __pthread_mutex_lock
strong_alias (__pthread_mutex_lock, pthread_mutex_lock)
strong_alias (__pthread_mutex_lock, __pthread_mutex_lock_internal)
#endif
-
上一篇
互斥锁的实现(转)
-
下一篇
内核同步方法-原子操作
核心技术类目
全部主题
Hadoop
AWS
移动游戏
Java
Android
iOS
Swift
智能硬件
Docker
OpenStack
VPN
Spark
ERP
IE10
Eclipse
CRM
JavaScript
数据库
Ubuntu
NFC
WAP
jQuery
BI
HTML5
Spring
Apache
.NET
API
HTML
SDK
IIS
Fedora
XML
LBS
Unity
Splashtop
UML
components
Windows Mobile
Rails
QEMU
KDE
Cassandra
CloudStack
FTC
coremail
OPhone
CouchBase
云计算
iOS6
Rackspace
Web App
SpringSide
Maemo
Compuware
大数据
aptech
Perl
Tornado
Ruby
Hibernate
ThinkPHP
HBase
Pure
Solr
Angular
Cloud Foundry
Redis
Scala
Django
Bootstrap
- 个人资料
-
- 访问:45275次
- 积分:573
-
等级:
- 排名:千里之外
- 原创:10篇
- 转载:10篇
- 译文:0篇
- 评论:7条
- 文章搜索
查看评论
1楼
-
-
看似简单的一个函数,实现起来如此复杂,不禁让我感叹前辈们的伟大。
xudong4877
2011-09-05 16:21发表
[回复]
[登录]或
[注册]